Essay on andrea yates

Case Analysis of Andrea Yates

Day by day, people around the world do many bad things and we do not have other choices but face them. One June 20, 2001, 36-year-old Andrea Yates, a Texas mother of five kids ranging in age This world is full of many things we will never understand. Nobody said life is from 6 months to 7 years, drowned all of her children and then phoned the police. The controversial question pops up: Is this woman guilty of capital murder? The truth is that she should not be punished for what she did considering that she did not know right from wrong. Prison is not the right punishment for her.

. Department of Health and Human Services revels that Postpartum depression is a common, frequently unrecognized, yet devastating disorder. If it not treated early, will develop the followings symptoms: Dysphoric mood, loss of interest in usually pleasurable activities, difficulty concentrating or making decisions, psychomotor agitation or retardation, fatigue, changes in appetite or sleep, recurrent thoughts of death/suicide, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, especially failure at motherhood and excessive anxiety over a child's health.

Yates, had been suffering from post-partum depression since the birth of her two-year-old. She had been on medication, and Child Protection Services, who investigated the family after Andrea Yates's suicide attempt two years ago. The same people who irresponsibly claimed they had no reason to believe the children were not being properly cared for.

The trial began February 18, 2002. Yates was found guilty of two counts of capital murder on March 12, 2002, and sentenced to life in prison (with the possibility of parole after 40 years) on March 15, 2002

Four of the jurors who convicted Andrea Pia Yates of capital murder told a nationally televised news program that they believed the crime was premeditated, but they also believed the mother who drowned her five children was mentally ill. They said there's no doubt in anyone's, minds that she was mentally ill. Several of the jurors voted to convict Andrea Yates of capital murder, some of them initially voted for death, then the jury discussed it and agreed on the life sentence. They said the way she drowned her children in the family bathtub seemed premeditated and methodical. "She was able to describe what she did ... I felt like she knew exactly what she was doing, and she knew it was...

"Psychiatrist Park Dietz was wrong when he said he consulted on an episode of the TV show "Law & Order" involving a woman found innocent by reason of insanity for drowning her children. After jurors found Yates guilty, attorneys in the case and jurors learned no such episode existed. Park Dietz was the prosecution expert who came into court and told jurors that Andrea Yates was not legally insane at the time of the killings; that she didn't just snap and drown her kids," says Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen. "His testimony was vital to the prosecution's case." "We conclude that there is a reasonable likelihood that Dr. Dietz's false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury," the court ruled.

Essay on andrea yates

essay on andrea yates


essay on andrea yatesessay on andrea yatesessay on andrea yatesessay on andrea yates